Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/11/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:47:34 -0700
References: <BC996CCC-642A-439A-9648-C0EC23220C53@sfr.fr> <5273E8F4.6050107@lighttube.net>

> On 11/1/2013 12:35 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
>> I was in Paris last Saturday and had to get to the drugstore near my 
>> daughter's place.
>> 
>> I found this friendly pair among endangered species deserved 
>> "immortality" and asked them if I could take a snap, which they 
>> spontaneously agreed to.
>> 
>> So my question now is which one do you think works better if either does. 
>> And why svp.
>> 
>> a)
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370977-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+2-4113.jpg
>> 
>> or b)
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/370973-1/Paris-Hardware+Store+3-4114.jpg



b)  appeals to me more because the couple seems more engaged with you and 
the camera,



s




>> 
>> Thank you in anticipation.
>> 
>> Philippe
>> 
>> 
>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to 
>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>> NO ARCHIVE
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Titis Parisiens and a question)