Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:39:36 +0530
References: <20131028224852.60DE053C182@barracuda.rutabaga.org> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0D6FF69@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1AxDG1ZASuxbs2zx8Hrur-NO4mZBuWo7mPSdCN2YFp2Rg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ19dAw41py4xAsZWh8M6k5P=G57P=LWVmJqJribaSnfag@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0D71BB5@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Save money? Get equivalent lenses inexpensively? Less weight? Better
low light capabilities (key for Tina)? The list can go on - the
million dollar question is - do you want to buy equipment to fit the
job at the least cost or not? Tina is a professional, unlike all of
us. Rules change in that sphere - most pros I know (and I know quite a
few very, very well) are very practical about equipment, not
sentimental.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:24 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:
> Why on earth would somebody with a large Leica collection want to do that?
>
> john
> ________________________________________
>
>
> As a practical user, I would wait and then buy a Fuji XE-2 and a Fuji
> 35mm f1.4...(-: Gives you a light kit, great quality sensor/lens and
> relatively inexpensive...and ISO 25,600 if the specs run true
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
> wrote:
>>  A DR Summicron that has been operated on works well on the M240?  In the
>> close range?  Details, please.
>>
>> I am looking for something smaller and lighter than the Noctilux.  I love
>> my Noctilux but I don't always need 1.0 and the size does keep me from
>> using it as often as the 35/1.4 which is my normal lens to keep on the 
>> M240
>> or the MM but the 50 would give a little more reach and a "normal"
>> perspective.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tina
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:00 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A DR Summicron like that works well on the M (240) in the close range :-)
>>>
>>> What are the reasons for looking for something other than the Noctilux?
>>> Anything other than the Noctilux asph will be smaller/lighter but the DR
>>> and pre-asph Summilux give a look more like the f1.0 Noctilux than the
>>> Summilux asph does.....
>>>
>>> john
>>> ________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> Tina:
>>> I also have a Dual-Range Summicron. I sent it to DAG, who ground off the
>>> close-focus cam (the one used with the "eyes." I think it cost $80.  So 
>>> now
>>> it fits on my M8 and should fit on any other digital M.  I sold the 
>>> eyes..
>>>  So now I have a lens I can use on my digital M instead of a lens I can
>>> only use when I shoot film, which I don't.
>>>
>>> For a while I thought it was wrong to defile such an elegant mechanical
>>> object. Then I decided: Lenses are to be used.  Food for thought.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>> -------------
>>> Tina wrote:
>>> Yes, the Noctilux is my only practical 50.  I have a Summicron that has 
>>> the
>>> eyes, but I don't think that fits on anything current.  I probably use my
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] FW:Re: 50 Summilux)