Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I DK if this lens is the king or the queen yet its bokeh as demonstrated in the samples available is creamy to the full - thanks for the input Ph Le 10 oct. 13 ? 22:25, John McMaster a ?crit : > http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/10/a-new-king-of-bokeh.html > > john > ________________________________________ > > > On Oct 10, 2013, at 12:32 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > >> I think the "King of Bokeh." accolade has been retracted..... > > > > why is that ? > > s > > > >> >> john >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Julian Koplen <jkoplen at sc.rr.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> According to some chart I found online, Version 3 was made in >>>> Canada, >>> Version 4 in Germany. This site also noted that Version 4 >>> received the >>> appellation, "King of Bokeh." >>>> >>>> http://www.overgaard.dk/leica-35mm-summicron-M-f20.html >>> >>> >>> that is the lens I have... >>> >>> >>> Steve >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- From: Frank Filippone >>>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 2:08 PM >>>> To: Leica Users Group >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] M lenses on Fuji X >>>> >>>> I think there is little that can not fit. If the lens protrudes too >>>> deeply >>>> (21SA) or has a monstrous diameter of the rear element there >>>> would be >>>> clearance issues. There could be angular optical ray issues with >>>> lenses like the 12mm Cosina. >>>> >>>> I remember no physical differences between the V2 or V3 35 >>>> Summicron >>> lenses. >>>> At least at the camera end of the optic. >>>> >>>> Frank Filippone >>>> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince. NO ARCHIVE