Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 15:00:01 -0500 (CDT)

Re-read my reply, as I gave my info on the D4...Works very nice with manual 
focus lenses, although low light is a bit more dicey.  But the D4 has a 
screen more suited for manual focussing than the D3 series.

Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kayai" <red735i at verizon.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2013 1:05:30 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast

Thanks to everyone who responded. There seems to be a consensus that all the 
200 and 300 series are pretty dismal for MF lenses. A Katzeye screen helped. 
The D600 was reported better. Noticeably absent was any info on the D3/4  
Looks like the D1x is not a bad choice, still. 

My son responded with disbelief that I would not chuck my MF lenses and buy 
and use AF lenses exclusively. 

I plan to cut him out of my will. 

Frank Filippone
> 

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast)
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Kayai) ([Leica] OT. Nikon screen brightness and contrast)