Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/08/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] RED
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 14:00:49 -0700
References: <9C6AE992-BB9F-46CC-9FAC-BCC022466B6B@gmail.com> <FEF8572FA5F4448D94D7AE928A91EB88@syneticfeba505>
 
Ted, do these have to be brand new pics?



Steve








On Aug 2, 2013, at 1:58 PM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote:

> Jeffery Smith SHOWED:
> Subject: [Leica] RED
> 
> 
>> No, I don't know what this means either.
>> 
>> http://www.pbase.com/jefferylsmith/image/151633190
> 
> Hi Jeffery,
> Certainly a rather eye catching "red" to say the least. However it sure 
> peeks one's curiosity to find out what it means?
> 
> Good example of RED!
> 
> cheers,
> Dr.ted :-) 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] RED)
 In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] RED)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] RED)