Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]np -Lew Schwartz On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> wrote: > Yes, both sites use the same basic software, with a few different choices. > > My point is that more people look at my images on the OM gallery than do > on the LUG gallery. About twice as many. > > > Jim Nichols > Tullahoma, TN USA > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Montie" <montoid at earthlink.net> > > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:09 PM > > Subject: Re: [Leica] An Observation > > > Not real sure what you are asking here, but your images usually look fine >> on both sites (on my screen, anyway). >> >> Montie >> >> >> When I post images made with Zuiko lenses, I post to the OM Gallery. >>> When I have images made with Leica lenses, I post to the LUG Gallery. >>> My >>> email messages announcing these images go to both lists. >>> >>> I normally find that images posted to the OM Gallery get twice as many >>> viewings as those posted to the LUG Gallery. This is puzzling to me. >>> >>> Do OM listers browse the galleries, independent of recent posting >>> messages? >>> >>> Or, AG, could there be a different tracking algorithm in play here? >>> >>> Jim Nichols >>> Tullahoma, TN USA >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>> more information >>> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> >> >> > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >