Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Buying Leica.....
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:38:09 -0500
References: <CA+yJO1B1qyjoP1+Ue-1vzL6YfH5W7_kSGws7FgdHbcWxy9U30Q@mail.gmail.com> <vDAg1l0030AFV7C01DAhKK>

Oh Sierra (sorry, military lingo)

If you were starting out today, the only way you'd have a Leica is if your
husband bought it for you.

-
Chris Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana
260-437-8990

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
Become a fan on Facebook




On 7/1/13 7:58 PM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote:

>To me the camera matters.  I've used other cameras.  For stock or large 
>enlargements, you examine the files at 100%.  There is no contest.  I 
>hate chromatic aberrations, fringing, soft edges, awful bokeh - all of 
>which you get with other lenses and other cameras.  With Leica cameras 
>and Leica lenses, I don't worry about 100% examinations.  They are 
>always good!
> Sometimes great.  If I'm going to spend my time and energy and money 
>for travel to take photos, I'm not going to take a chance on an 
>inferior camera or lens.
>
>Tina
>
>
>On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> I post pictures from my M9, my Olympus EP-1, my Pentax Kr, and my 
>>iPhone 5.
>>
>> The most pleasurable to use is the M9, but I do sometimes need AF, 
>>and thus  the other three get some amount of use.
>>
>> The quality of the "three" is not there, but I've learned to use them  
>>appropriately, and with my editing eye, I can produce web postings 
>>that  satisfy, but the high detail of the Leica files enable me to do 
>>things with  flowers that just are not possible with the others.  So, 
>>to me, the camera  matters.  (I could wish for live view and a tilting 
>>Electronic viewfinder
>> though.)  ;-)
>>
>> hmmm, (Sony?)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > All,
>> >
>> > At the end of the day, whether we are using Leica, Fuji or 
>> > something
>> else I
>> > don't doubt that Uncle Doctor Ted would impatiently remind us that
>>it's
>> us
>> > not
>> > the cameras that take the photos, and that if we are any good 
>> > anyway
>>then
>> > the
>> > camera shouldn't matter a huge deal.
>> >
>> > Peter
>> >
>> >
>> > On 26/06/2013 23:25, John McMaster wrote:
>> > > I really wonder if I would have bought into Leica if I was buying
>> > now..... I had not shot with nor knew anybody who owned one (I have
>>owned
>> > Canon, Nikon, Contax, Olympus, Hasselblad, LF etc and shot with a 
>> > lot
>> more,
>> > all prime lenses etc) and thought the name was all image ;-)
>> > >
>> > > I was coming from an APS-C Nikon and was looking at Canon 5D II 
>> > > or
>>M9,
>> > at that time size (I knew I would not carry a DSLR) so went M9. If 
>> > the
>> Fuji
>> > series was on the market at the time would I have bought that?
>> > >
>> > >>From http://zackarias.com/blog/
>> > >
>> > > "You see, for decades Leica was the shit for the traveling
>>journalist,
>> > street shooters, documentary photographers, etc. They are fantastic
>> cameras
>> > with an undeniable heritage. But here?s the deal. The folks who put
>>Leica
>> > on the map can?t afford them any longer. They are a boutique camera 
>> > company. The working stiff can?t shell out close to $10,000 for a 
>> > body
>> and
>> > a lens. Go price out 2 M?s, a 20mm ish lens, a 35mm, and a 75mm. Go
>>price
>> > that out. Then price out an x100s, an X-Pro1, and the Fuji 14mm, 
>> > 35mm,
>> and
>> > 60mm lens. You still haven?t spent the price of a single Leica body
>>yet.
>> > Let alone two of them. And glass."
>> > >
>> > > With hindsight I would still go Leica, nothing to touch the 
>> > > lenses
>>for
>> > different looks and I prefer the simpler operation, but if I had 
>> > not
>>used
>> > them what would make me spend 'rather a lot' more on Leica than Fuji?
>> Does
>> > 'full frame' or the build quality make enough of a difference for 
>> > the
>> price
>> > jump to most people?
>> > >
>> > > john
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Leica Users Group.
>> > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
>> > > information
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > ===========================================================
>> > Dr Peter Dzwig
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
>> > information
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sonny
>> http://sonc.com/look/
>> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>>
>> USA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Tina Manley
>http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Buying Leica.....)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Buying Leica.....)