Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Agree. My default is to have EV set at -1/3. With some platforms you can set what pure white is on the in camera histogram. True for the new M240. Instead of clipping showing at 255/255/255 you can set it for 250 or 253 or whatever. There was a big stink about ETTR (expose to the right) awhile ago started by Michael Riechman and Co. I understood the logic and math, but many people started exposing their histograms and highlights were blown. I remember one fellow who was showing prints with totally blown cloud centers. He thought his images were fantastic because he had more information to work with because he had really exposed to the right... So rarely clip is my working mantra: only with bright reflections intentionally. Shadows have tons more to recover... Sent from my iPad On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:46 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > Yes and that's why if what I just clicked is something I really want to > have > come out I check the back of the camera to make sure the high tones are > fully there. Check the histogram even. If not I set the exposure over ride > down a bit more and click it again. > If I click on something in which I totally don't care then maybe I wont > check it as I'm walking away. And have regretted doing that. > As why I'm I shooting it if I don't care? Best to trust our instincts > I err on the side of under exposure for sure. > Have great luck in bring up stuff out of the darks. Not the opposite.. > > > On 6/22/13 11:52 PM, "John McMaster" <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > >> I am not disagreeing with you, but with colour digital it is unusual to >> have >> all three colours blown out so some recovery is possible. A blown >> highlight on >> a Monochrom is pure white with no tonal recovery, but I have not found it >> a >> huge issue in practice. >> >> john >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> Another thought which caught me on his thing is he says the camera is not >>> tolerant of over exposure. >>> I'm wondering what camera was he using which WAS tolerant of over >>> exposure? >>> As as far as I know all digital cameras are very similar to shooting >>> slides. >>> You don't over expose them. You place your high tones carefully and let >>> the >>> dark tones fall where they may. >>> A statement like "this camera is not tolerant of over exposure" makes me >>> thing this is not a guy who has gotten into digital really. >>> I read him widely during the film era. I hope he's really making the >>> transition. >>> >>> >>> On 6/21/13 10:32 AM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Great review by Mason Resnick! I agree with almost everything he says >>>> ;-) >>>> >>>> Tina >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Greg Rubenstein <gcr910 at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> PDN finally got around to it, I guess. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.pdnonline.com/gear/Camera-Review-Leica- >>> 8353.shtml?utm_sour >>>>> ce=Silve >>> rpop&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=41858219&utm_term=96312&ut >>> m_conten >>>>> t= >>>>> >>>>> Greg Rubenstein >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > -- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information