Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't thing the results we or I get at iso 6400 with a full frame digital sensor is in the same ballpark category at all with the results anyone I've ever seen got with film pushing tri x or Neopan 1600 film. I think its about seven or eight times better. Totally Viable. Vs barely viable. Iso 6400 is cruising speed in digital not even breaking a sweat. With film it was like nitro-burning funny cars. You got grain like mushroom caps and shadow detail that wasn't really there. You had to belive it was there. On 6/3/13 1:28 PM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2013, at 3:24 PM, philippe.amard wrote: > >> Would 10 links at 6400 be alright with you? I'd throw in one more link of >> the >> same for good measure ;-) > > Nope. I've seen plenty of 6400 myself - even back from my own film/darkroom > experimental days. ;~) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/