Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I belive legal action is the result of someone being harmed. You have to prove damages. On 5/28/13 12:44 AM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote: > Generally in the US, legal action is made in anticipation of money. > Obviously, no one knows how little money is to be made in fine art > photography. > > -----Original Message----- > From: George Lottermoser > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 10:17 PM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: Re: [Leica] a photographer sued > > > On May 27, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > >> I'm still not clear on what line is being crossed here. Is it the taking >> of >> the photographs or the possibility of making money? > > not sure what "alleged" line is "allegedly" being crossed > to be determined > to be continued > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/