Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:02:06 +0200
References: <CA+yJO1DEQPcvV3g5N9MX3W7cr4JgrP6p8=B_KqqwbhdJp+Gi-Q@mail.gmail.com> <05937037-94AA-4BF9-BB28-21C5131E60F7@mac.com> <CA+yJO1Cc++J+uqJR7R-TFtR0YHG3E_zNJFOZ4HqbQ3ani0vUUg@mail.gmail.com> <B25CEA76-F607-4C5B-B52D-0B1C096442A0@mac.com>

You'd need a VERY steady hand to allow for such a near motion blur- 
free  time-lapse - 1/2 sec? ???

Ph


Le 27 mai 13 ? 21:54, George Lottermoser a ?crit :

> Sure. Someone walking past the doorway could allow for two "bright"  
> moments.
>
> a note off the iPad, George
>
> On May 27, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote:
>
>> No. I was the only one there who wasn't part of the family and I've  
>> never
>> carried a flash.  It is very dark inside and very bright outside.   
>> Could
>> that act like a flash if somebody opened and shut the door during the
>> exposure?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE






Replies: Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Double Exposure?)