Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:58:03 -0700
References: <519C0A9F.6090906@jayburleson.com> <CAAsXt4NcfW=+pM4zEpNFSxXatM6UWE8JeTc3PYrRERFD661aSQ@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9C552A852@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>
 
Thanks John!


On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:46 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
wrote:

> Yes, the 35mm at f1.4 on Fuji will give an image similar to a 50mm at f2.0
> on the M9 (as is a 25mm at f1.0 on m4/3)
>
> john
>
> >
> > One thing I am unsure of, and perhaps others know the answer to, is if at
> > f1,4 there is greater depth of field on the Fuji's cropped sensor vs the
> M9 full
> > sensor.
> >
> > Bob Adler
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler
In reply to: Message from leica at jayburleson.com (Jay Burleson) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] The Fuji M-Adapter)