Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] huh…..?
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 22:12:01 -0700
References: <CAFT=JcC+zMOcTuUcSrJRP1LJBW+k4vki7Cny77otyJbCL6RFSQ@mail.gmail.com>

yes, a real baby...

for sure......


part of a swimming lesson no doubt,


Steve




On May 15, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Peter Cheyne <peter.cheyne at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
> 
> what I meant was, is your friend certain that the man has a real baby on
> his back? To my eyes, it looks like a toy doll, not a real baby.
> 
> I couldn't see the large version of the photo (I probably have a problem
> with my browser settings).
> 
> Maybe I can only see a toy doll because I don't want to believe that the
> man was putting a baby to such terrible risk.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Peter
> 
> P.S. Apologies for my earlier typo, which prevented my intended meaning
> from being communicated.
> I thought I had typed "If it's just a doll [etc]", but I mistakenly typed
> "If it's just a baby [etc]".
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from peter.cheyne at gmail.com (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] huh…..?)