Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Technical detail--why?
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 19:35:11 -0700
References: <1FAEC7E9-142F-40DF-BB4C-AECAA40CEDF9@frozenlight.eu>

Troll...
:-)

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 24, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:

> Someone, I think Cedric, commented on Jean-Michel's pictures today, asking 
> for technical details. That got me thinking--back when I first took up 
> photography in 1985, I religiously noted lens, exposure etc. in a 
> notebook. I still have that notebook. The only thing is, the I have never 
> actually used the information noted therein. Nowadays, I do not care about 
> the technical details, indeed, when I post my weekly pictures, I don't 
> even mention the equipment used. What's the point? Either the photo is 
> good or it isn't. Whether I used my 4x5 or my iPhone should not influence 
> the viewer's evaluation.
> 
> Technical details are useless at best, and harmful at worst.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)