Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New M
From: scoutfinch at chartermi.net (Sue Ryan)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 15:46:59 -0500
References: <CD567BD9.5E0F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I refer to the Monochrom as the MM, for what's worth....

Sue

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 1, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Tina I don't think people will at all be referring to the new Monochrom as
> the new M very often at all.
> I do think they will refer to the M as the new Leica M and the other half
> the time the new Leica M 250.
> What I want to know is 250 what? Its a 25.
> 
> I think we should call it the new Leica M?
> (that's supposed to be a yin yang symbol.)
> 
> As this is the first M which is sealed ....(arf!)
> We should call it the Leica M?
> 
> 
> !!
> 
> On 2/28/13 2:34 PM, "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> wrote:
> 
>> The name is so very confusing!  I keep seeing references to the Leica M 
>> and
>> think they are referring to the Monochrom, but it's always the new one!
>> Are we going to call both of them the Leica M?
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> So a (very) few are out in the wild now....
>>> 
>>> john
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] New M)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New M)