Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, I have no experience of course, neither with Nikon nor with "M" However, the people I mentioned below, print 50" wide and above. Their comparison is the $20,000 digital back if they are "cheap," or $40,000 if they have the $$. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > There are too many ultrawide and wide Nikon Lenses to count being used by > pros every day. > > > On 2/21/13 10:02 PM, "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com> wrote: > > > Nah, R lens are still a niche market :-) > > > > Although some "high end" users (i.e. the people who otherwise spend > > $20,000+ for a medium format digital back) are complaining that the > D800/E > > is lacking in the wide angle end (especially in the corners), even if > they > > use the Zeiss prime lens, let alone the Nikon ones (these people are the > > ones who typically print 4 feet wide and higher). So who knows, may be > the > > Leica R, especially the 19mm would be up to the task? > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > >> Ah yes, I feel the value of my R lenses rising already. > >> > >> :-) > >> > >> Vick > >> > >> ______________________________**_________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See > >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug< > http://leica-users.org/mailman/ > >> listinfo/lug>for more information > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>