Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/02/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]LR is there now. Tina On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:33 AM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote: > I could probably get by without Photoshop with substitutes > > the place their squeezing me is InDesign > > I spend much of my life there > > How long before they put Lightroom into the equation? > > ric > > > On Feb 12, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Spencer Cheng <spencer at aotera.org> wrote: > > > Adobe has tried to convert all their PS users to the subscription model > for several years now because of their need for revenue. The number of > worthy-of-upgrade features they can add to PS is getting fewer and fewer. > Ergo, if everyone subscribes, they don't need to be as creative to extract > money from you. Rather than convincing you to pay for a upgrade every 2 > years, they can get $50/month from each and everyone of you forever. > > > > As Frank wrote, 20 GB is peanuts when it comes to storing photographs > and cost Adobe less than peanuts to provide. How a prolific photographer > would even upload s fraction of their work to the Adobe "cloud", I am not > sure. > > > > I am curious to see how many photographers would bite. The "cloud" is > the current fad. Good for somethings and not good for other things. :) > > > > Regards, > > Spencer > > > > On Feb 12, 2013, at 0:06, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> There no path for us who already have a current copy of Photoshop. Why > >> would I need two copies? > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com