Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 19:37:49 -0500

The wider the lens the more the distortion. That's all I'm saying I'm
surprised that would be in any way controversial.


On 1/19/13 12:05 PM, "Robert D. Baron" <robertbaron1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> ==On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at 
> rabinergroup.com>wrote:
> 
>> You shoot a crowd of people with a 28 you turn them all into a bunch of
>> midgets.
> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
> 
>> If your using Leica not Nikon optics the heads at the edges are
>> less watermelon like.
>> 
>> 
> So if I'm shooting people or dogs with a film or full frame digital Leica -
> particularly if I am reasonably close to them - I'm still going to get more
> accurate representations of their physical selves if I use a 50 rather than
> a 35?
> 
> Does that mean the laws of optics have not changed very much over the last
> sixty years?
> 
> --Bob
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)
In reply to: Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] Is 35 the Current 50?)