Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:42:53 -0500

Actually I am obviously capable of talking about a camera lens what  you are
interested in is talking about me  or to be more precise name calling.
I had posted on the lug a short while back a very carefully researched post
on the various versions of this lens which ones where bad and which were
good which was very well received.
I certainly don't give a damn, Sir what you think of me I'm not the subject
of this thread. As far as I knew we were not in the grade school playground
a place where you were obviously kicked around on a regular basis and have
never gotten over it. The internet is a perfect place people who have had
bad luck with direct confrontations.


On 1/19/13 4:20 AM, "Jayanand Govindaraj" <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote:

> This is the latest version we are all talking about. If you had ever 
> usedit,
> you could actually make a useful contribution - instead of your
> normal
imaginary, hypothetical ramblings!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Sat, Jan 19,
> 2013 at 2:46 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> We've talked
> this lens on the lug several times.
> There have been an amazing number of
> versions of this lens.
> Some were pretty bad. The more recent ones I'm sure
> pretty good.
>
>
> On 1/18/13 10:37 PM, "Howard Ritter" <hlritter at bex.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Jayanand?
> >
> > May I ask what you didn't like about that new
> 24-120?
> > Other than the size, weight, and being less sharp toward the
> corners at
> all
> > focal lengths than the new (non-gold-banded) 24-85?
> >
>
> > ?howard
> >
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj
> <jayanand at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I generally check out all lenses for at
> least a couple of hours of use
> >> before I buy - the only one I bought on
> impulse recently, without
> testing,
> >> the Nikon 24-120 f4 ended up being
> resold in a couple of months. There
> is a
> >> lesson there...(-:
> >>
> Cheers
> >> Jayanand
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:02 AM, philippe.amard
> <philippe.amard at sfr.fr
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> The last two lenses I bought came
> from local  street shops, Phalsbourg
> &
> >>> Metz :-)
> >>> And the last 2
> cameras from the local FNAC.
> >>> I find it so frustrating when you can't
> manipulate the gear prior to
> >>> punching the PIN code
> >>>
> >>> Amiti?s
>
> >>> Philippe
> >>>
> >>> Le 17 janv. 13 ? 17:58, Jean-Michel Mertz a ?crit :
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I've read most of the posts
> concerning ebay and its potential
> dangers. I
> >>>> think I might have an
> idea. I have been using one single lens (the
> >>>> collapsible elmar 50) for
> a number of weeks now (+ M8)  and I have
> come to
> >>>> the conclusion that
> this pair covers most of my needs. I do have
> another
> >>>> lens (sum 35
> asph) but I seldom use it. I think this is probably
> something
> >>>> many
> other luggers experience, this successful match between a
> photog, a
> >>>>
> body and a lens which often results in wonderful pictures being made.
> See
>
> >>>> the use HCB made of his IIIg + 50mm. So, do we really need to have
>
> that
> >>>> many lenses and cameras since we all have our favourite gear? (I'm
> of
> >>>> course not talking of professional photogs!)Just an idea to beat
> ebay
> and
> >>>> perhaps favour our local dealer - once every five years, for
> used and
> less
> >>>> expensive gear!Jean-Michel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
>
> >>>> See
> >>>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>
> http://leica-users.org/mailma
> >>>> n/listinfo/lug>for more information
>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is
> invisible to
> >>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
>
> >>> See
> >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>
> http://leica-users.org/mailman
> >>> /listinfo/lug>for more information
>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users
> Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See
> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users
> Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr) ([Leica] Nikon 24-120 - DISCONTINUED)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)