Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But bad customer service may. Phil Forrest On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:33:50 -0500 Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > One body or lens does not spoil the pudding. > > > On 1/14/13 1:26 AM, "Ken Iisaka" <ken at iisaka.com> wrote: > > > In some ways, since a lot of us buy a large number of consumer > > goods, we are diversifying our risks for such events. We win some, > > and we lose some. > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj > > <jayanand at gmail.com>wrote: > > > >> To give the flip side, I purchased my D800E here in India in May > >> last year for Rs.145000, and now it costs Rs.185000 - a difference > >> of Rs.40,000 which is roughly USD730, which is what I have gained > >> in 7-8 months. I have been pissed off with Adobe many times for > >> announcing a new iteration of CS a short period after I upgraded, > >> but I need Photoshop more than Adobe needs me, and that > >> realization makes me behave more rationally. These things happen, > >> and a rebate or upgrade has to start on some date, and any buyer > >> who has just bought it outside the qualifying period is going to > >> feel upset, but I doubt, in general, that it is in the buyer's > >> long term interest to act on the initial feeling of pique. Cheers > >> Jayanand > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Ken Iisaka <ken at iisaka.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I am sorry I sounded very unsympathetic. However, I really wanted > >>> to > >> point > >>> out that the "damage" was far less than $700, as the 24-85 VR > >>> lenses are available for substantially less than $300. It > >>> happens. Sorry it happened to you, and you felt so angry. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Steve Barbour > >>> <steve.barbour at gmail.com > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>>>> Nikon offering a $700 rebate within weeks of my buying a D600 > >>>>>> at > >> full > >>>> price > >>>>>> followed by Nikon USA's insulting email correspondence and > >>>>>> inaction afterward as I sought some recourse, has ended my 40 > >>>>>> year love for > >>> Nikon > >>>>>> and its cameras. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gone is the D600 and shortly all of my Nikon gear (except for > >>>>>> my > >> 1960s > >>>>>> Nikomat and 43-86mm zoom). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Enter the brave new world of the Sony A99. Wow. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So, good riddance Nikon -- this disrespected former customer > >>>>>> will > >>> never > >>>> buy > >>>>>> or recommend one of your products ever again. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> . > >>>>>> Dave. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> pissed and you have a right to be David, but you know > >>>> what....you have hurt yourself and Nikon will never know the > >>>> difference. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Steve > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >>>> information > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ken Iisaka > >>> first name at last name dot org or com > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >>> information > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > >> information > >> > > > > > > > > -- http://philipforrestphoto.wordpress.com/ http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/philforrest