Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] any Sony rx 1 users
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:20:37 -0800
References: <CAJ3Pgh6bJ6PhdPf-3N_Lx2FiA_PLdKwV-32Z=EJ6my9YPk38gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CD10EE74.31B9%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CAJ3Pgh60E_+Nc=fDR1FOpu=A-UX3TNeuQdT+Pd_1-AyOGVdbPQ@mail.gmail.com> <175e01cded62$b6433c50$22c9b4f0$@verizon.net> <CAJ3Pgh4DB5bQQ_PA9G+G8oO6_AjVdwxdcwGajNDBPLEEsxGpMg@mail.gmail.com> <175f01cded65$936a4ef0$ba3eecd0$@verizon.net>
The 21 f/4.5 Biogon does have a bad color shift on the M9, but for B&W
it's fine. Cornerfix also takes care of it, but I don't use that for
B&W unless I'm stitching.
I don't think the Super Elmar-M 21 f/3.4 was out when I purchased the
21 Biogon. I think my 24 Super Elmar-M is amazingly good, so that
Leica 21mm f/3.4 might be the one I'd look at first for good color or
as the closest competitor to the 21 4.5 Biogon.
Paul
www.PaulRoark.com
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net>
wrote:
> I asked because I read this aboui the Zeiss 21mm optics from Ken
> Rockwell.....
>
> "This f/4.5 lens is not for use on the LEICA M9 because its rear nodal
> point
> is not in a position for which the M9's internal lens profiles can
> compensate....
Replies:
Reply from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
In reply to:
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] any Sony rx 1 users)