Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:38:37 -0500

As far as schlepping goes they have bags with wheels now I bet next there
there will be bags with balloons.


On 1/2/13 9:14 PM, "Bob Adler" <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote:

> For about $17,000, you can have an Alpa and 22MP (full frame) back and 70mm
> Rodenstock lens with 5deg of tilt. It would weigh about 6.5lbs with
> batteries. The camera would allow for back shift (horizontal) giving you
> coverage of a 37mm lens in 35mm format.
> 
> M9 approx. 6k
> 35 'lux approx 4k
> Another 'lux lens approx 4k
> Weight maybe 3-4lbs with batteries.
> 
> For those who don't hike horse-killing trails (where every gram counts),
> but go on 5-10 mile hikes, it's pretty darn light, sharp as a tack, and 3
> shots for stitching at 22MP each, using 9micron pixel sights. Price wise
> about the same as an M9 with 3 lenses (or less).
> 
> The hard part is finding a Leaf or Phase 22MP back that someone wants to
> part with!
> 
> No street shooter but a heck of a landscaper's kit...
> Best,
> Bob
> 
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> I schlepped my hasselblad and a couple of lenses around Colorado once,
>> and
>>> it wasn't a problem. ...
>> 
>> The Rollei SL66 is built like a tank; the tilt mechanism is probably
>> part of what adds weight over the Hasselblad.  So, when I went to a
>> TLR and could have an entire outfit, tripod included, that weighed in
>> at 5 lb., that made a believer out of me in terms of what I wanted to
>> carry and what image quality I could get from such an outfit.  The
>> Bronica RF 645 took over from the Rollei TLR because of the wide angle
>> and ability to hold Tech Pan flat.  (My stash of frozen Tech Pan 120
>> is going to go on eBay soon.)  The Canon 5D2 convinced me that full
>> frame digital could do what I needed, but the Canon outfit was too
>> heavy, and their wide angles really are not top notch (the 24 Tilt
>> Shift is special, however).  The M9 simply did a better job for less
>> weight.
>> 
>> As an aside, let me describe Sheppard Pass, the last trip for the full
>> SL66 outfit.  It starts in Owens Valley at 5000 ft.  On the way up to
>> the 12000 foot pass, there was a dead horse on the trail when I did
>> the trip.  On the other side, at the Muir Trail, the Sheppard Pass
>> trail is marked with the skull of a horse.  It is literally a killer.
>> 
>> Paul
>> www.PaulRoark.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
In reply to: Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)