Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 18:52:33 -0800
References: <D9C01005-E718-47B4-B7DD-F25EA3716979@mac.com> <592833333.14716580.1356895625999.JavaMail.root@cds036> <CA+yJO1A+QxSzgW6PTb0fAqdd-Bfe4GqcJVNZhU7ENk=9zMM6PA@mail.gmail.com> <72E3BA90-2255-40F9-8D46-98DFC82A248B@gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh4NDyw4MQoumRS5FgnVp9EMQCu=NSg8jaz-+XW0jLz+8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAsXt4OFyT3015VPr_taAOiZ=XrT0poh+i+E=Yw0Vmym=-MgPw@mail.gmail.com> <8D951663-1907-4D08-BBDB-94BCAD05C89D@mac.com> <CA+yJO1AA7KejXhCS+WqU7SFy2RemfJ5=Dptvif0LnLS_eXjfTw@mail.gmail.com> <50E408DA.3060904@summaventures.com> <CAJ3Pgh7aqnth-V1ZQQyO6+g7Lgzt16oo0BTQ1fdDGVV472is2Q@mail.gmail.com> <E733C67D28264A9AA8B3B3FFCBC56B83@billHP> <CAJ3Pgh438Hb4Fo3gi+4Q3+2NGZqDU_zJ5DyqHUr7_OKRWM9P9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAsXt4NbmiFpRcZF4+SVSf0hyvbUaG2+S=eScUfrbmMxr=7mDw@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99FACA77C@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

If you're not using a tripod for landscape, then you could reduce your pack
weight to your iPhone...
;-)

I didn't include that because I know Paul has his tripod strapped to his
leg; a true gun slinger!

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:17 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> Plus the tripod for weight and the slow(er) speed of use ;-)
>
> john
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > For about $17,000, you can have an Alpa and 22MP (full frame) back and
> > 70mm Rodenstock lens with 5deg of tilt. It would weigh about 6.5lbs with
> > batteries. The camera would allow for back shift (horizontal) giving you
> > coverage of a 37mm lens in 35mm format.
> >
> > M9 approx. 6k
> > 35 'lux approx 4k
> > Another 'lux lens approx 4k
> > Weight maybe 3-4lbs with batteries.
> >
> > For those who don't hike horse-killing trails (where every gram counts),
> but
> > go on 5-10 mile hikes, it's pretty darn light, sharp as a tack, and 3
> shots for
> > stitching at 22MP each, using 9micron pixel sights. Price wise about the
> same
> > as an M9 with 3 lenses (or less).
> >
> > The hard part is finding a Leaf or Phase 22MP back that someone wants to
> > part with!
> >
> > No street shooter but a heck of a landscaper's kit...
> > Best,
> > Bob
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Bill Pearce <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I schlepped my hasselblad and a couple of lenses around Colorado
> > > > once,
> > > and
> > > > it wasn't a problem. ...
> > >
> > > The Rollei SL66 is built like a tank; the tilt mechanism is probably
> > > part of what adds weight over the Hasselblad.  So, when I went to a
> > > TLR and could have an entire outfit, tripod included, that weighed in
> > > at 5 lb., that made a believer out of me in terms of what I wanted to
> > > carry and what image quality I could get from such an outfit.  The
> > > Bronica RF 645 took over from the Rollei TLR because of the wide angle
> > > and ability to hold Tech Pan flat.  (My stash of frozen Tech Pan 120
> > > is going to go on eBay soon.)  The Canon 5D2 convinced me that full
> > > frame digital could do what I needed, but the Canon outfit was too
> > > heavy, and their wide angles really are not top notch (the 24 Tilt
> > > Shift is special, however).  The M9 simply did a better job for less
> > > weight.
> > >
> > > As an aside, let me describe Sheppard Pass, the last trip for the full
> > > SL66 outfit.  It starts in Owens Valley at 5000 ft.  On the way up to
> > > the 12000 foot pass, there was a dead horse on the trail when I did
> > > the trip.  On the other side, at the Muir Trail, the Sheppard Pass
> > > trail is marked with the skull of a horse.  It is literally a killer.
> > >
> > > Paul
> > > www.PaulRoark.com
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Bob Adler


In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (TED GRANT) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)