Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark)
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:01:56 -0800
References: <D9C01005-E718-47B4-B7DD-F25EA3716979@mac.com> <592833333.14716580.1356895625999.JavaMail.root@cds036> <CA+yJO1A+QxSzgW6PTb0fAqdd-Bfe4GqcJVNZhU7ENk=9zMM6PA@mail.gmail.com> <72E3BA90-2255-40F9-8D46-98DFC82A248B@gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh4NDyw4MQoumRS5FgnVp9EMQCu=NSg8jaz-+XW0jLz+8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAsXt4OFyT3015VPr_taAOiZ=XrT0poh+i+E=Yw0Vmym=-MgPw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ3Pgh4ph=HG5O3poEP=NGT1WQVRxRFuq4-sZUpqHSQ3R9gMLA@mail.gmail.com>

Having read the rest of the posts on this thread now, I want to add
that I'm not sure what the "practical" limits of the M9 is for what I
do.  I print up to 22 x 28 or 30 inches (2.5 cm/inch) with the carbon
pigments on matte paper, and a "single" (in focus) M9 frame looks very
good from normal viewing distance at that size.  However, upon very
close inspection, the detail freaks among us (me included) would
notice that it's a slight stretch for the M9.  I don't know if more
MP, however, would increase my sales at all.  (More MP would, I think,
increase my fun, however!)

I'm about to take my Claria/Noritsu dye on metallic paper medium up to
17 inches on an Epson 4000.  At 13" (Epson 1400) the M9 images have
allowed me -- for the first time -- to compete with (out sell) the
painters in Gallery Los Olivos in mixed media, front-room, all-member
shows.  The people off the street that we sell to at that gallery may
not know it, but their visual processing systems are causing them to
see more that they've ever seen in a photo.  At 13" more than the M9
has is not need.  18 really well done MPs sell.  I'll see if the same
magic holds for 17 inch wide metallic photos.  (Also, a color 13"
metallic is going in the January All Member show to see if a full
frame M9 color print has the same effect.)

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com


In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (TED GRANT) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert Adler) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
Message from roark.paul at gmail.com (Paul Roark) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)