[Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK

[rgacpa at gmail.com (Robert G Adler)]

How so? If you mean by merging, stitching, the pixels per unit of image 
circle is far greater in the best MFDB than in the M9 (or even N 800E). 

For a 50mm field of view the new Leica M250 will still have 25 megapixels of 
coverage. A 80 MP digital back will have 80 megapixels for the same field of 
view with an 80mm lens. If you want to throw stitching into the mix then, as 
you know George, we need to compare that to stitching with MF. 

But if you mean something else by merging, I don't know what that term means 
but would love to know!
Best,
Bob


Bob Adler

On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:38 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Robert Adler wrote:
> 
>> Not too sure about it rivaling medium to large format...
> 
> I'd imagine that exposing and merging multiple M9 frames
> would begin to "rival" medium format CCD sensor real estate ;~)
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser 
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information