Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Dec 11, 2012, at 8:51 PM, EPL <manolito at videotron.ca> wrote: > This line that "colour shows the soul/spirit" while B&W shows folk's > clothing has always struck me as the opinion of an idiot clod. huh, hitting the bottle again? > > Since before time immemorial, people have chosen the clothes they wear. > > They do not choose their "souls," neither do they choose the colour of > their > skin nor the colour of their eyes or their hair (although the latter is > easily altered). > > The clothes & adornments people choose to wear constitute a very telling > and > intimate expression of their personality, their self-image, their place (in > their mind's choices) in this world, within their particular culture and > time. I guess we should start painting all the marble statues..... > Would any of us see Marilyn Monroe as a green-eyed red-head, not the blond > she CHOSE to be? > > There are thousands of other examples. > > I am all for colour. I don't hate B&W but I do not celebrate it as > superior. > > Great artists have always sketched in B&W (pencil or charcoal, for > example). > Their great works are always in full colour. > > Even ancient sculpture had colour infill. Great ancient Egyptian tomb art > is > mostly in colour. > > Life is in colour. B&W is an illusion resulting from a technological > deficiency. > > Take B&W photos if it pleases you and if it matches your mindset. But to > promote it as inherently superior is just plain silly. > > Emanuel > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information