Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A picture that should not have been taken
From: wrs111445 at yahoo.com (W. R. Smith)
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 04:02:40 -0800 (PST)
References: <142571BC-A616-4A3C-A7CC-7826C670FA5E@frozenlight.eu> <1CD51CAB-54BD-4E1F-BDB5-89A7B2F0C0A3@gmail.com>

He was just trying to get the best shot to shop around NYC sell for big $$. 
Pretty #@&* crass in my book.


________________________________
 From: Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollquerol at gmail.com>
To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> 
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] A picture that should not have been taken
 
Yes Nathan,

Very sad!

Un abrazo
Lluis 



El 06/12/2012, a las 06:43, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:

> Or at least not been published.
> 
> As far as I am concerned, the photographer is a creep, as is, obviously, 
> the editor of the NY Post.
> 
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20611140
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> 
> 
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A picture that should not have been taken)
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] A picture that should not have been taken)