Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 21:04:24 -0000
References: <CCE1CFC6.27369%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1E3A79D3-8C1D-4A93-8DE6-70C18A5801FD@frozenlight.eu>

Heartily agree. Just sad I can't do it. I feel like the court eunuch - I 
know how it's done, but....

RoI Douglas
_________
Douglas Barry
Bray, Co. Wicklow
Republic of Ireland
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism


> One's ability to produce a pro level image is mostly a function of what is 
> between one's ears and only slightly of what is in the camera bag.
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>> A big difference between getting a pro job done and having a camera which
>> produces an image. One needs to be able to produce a pro level image.
>>
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>>
>>
>>> From: Don Dory <don.dory at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 20:20:22 -0500
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] Professional use and Professionalism
>>>
>>> I have read with great interest the thread on professional cameras and 
>>> the
>>> failings of Leica.
>>>
>>> My only real point is that if you are getting paid you have back ups to
>>> your back up.  If you can't afford two or three identical bodies then 
>>> you
>>> rotate into newer stuff before your current tool is too far gone to be
>>> dependable.  Same with lenses, power, flashes, and memory storage.  All
>>> things fail when you need them so there has to be a next.
>>>
>>> My second observation is that all brands fail, all lenses have issues, 
>>> and
>>> sensors from every vendor can do some very interesting things.  This is
>>> from direct observation from handling thousands(yes thousands) of 
>>> cameras,
>>> lenses, flashes and what have you.
>>>
>>> Last, the worst thing you can do is not use your equipment.  I see more
>>> really nice outside with fuzzy, stiff, non working insides because 
>>> someone
>>> put the item away in deep storage and didn't make such good choices as 
>>> to
>>> what that storage might be.
>>>
>>> Use the tool that you can afford that gets the job done.  Believe me, 
>>> I've
>>> gone down many rabbit holes searching for the best: knife, 1911, fast
>>> burning powder, 50mm lens, 35mm lens, framing hammer....My conclusion is
>>> that most of the time any of the top three manufacturer's in any given
>>> field will have a perfectly adequate choice starting in the low middle 
>>> of
>>> their line.  In Nikon you could make a living with a D5200 if you were 
>>> down
>>> to that.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Don
>>> don.dory at gmail.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Professional use and Professionalism)