Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/12/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Though they may have gotten it the first three times you just wrote it. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 17:36:41 -0800 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Cameras Real Pros Use READ RESPONSE! > > On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:58 PM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: > >> Hi Tina, >> Like you I haven't one iota of regret staying with Leica throughout my, >> now at least 55 years using Leica's of all kinds of models on assignments >> about the world!! I dabbled with C&N as a test for a day? But there wasn't >> any interest whatsoever! Put one of those down and pick-up a >> Leica????????? >> >> And you felt like you were ready to take on the world of photography! >> >> > Despite what Mark likes to misread, my take is pretty simple - if it is at > all reasonably possible to save up for a (used) Leica, by all means, it's > the most gratifying choice. The M-E is "only" $5400 now. And buy Leica lens > used. ZM lens in the focal length and aperture, if available, are quite > decent too. > > If I don't have any Leica glass, I may look at X-PRO1 or the like, but why > bother HEY MARK RABINER< READ THIS: when I have a set of Leica Summilux and > 28/2 'cron that I use and can rely on? > > > >> cheers, >> ted >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/ >> listinfo/lug>for more information >> > > > > -- > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information