Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]if it were not correct, we would not be here on LUG;^) ric On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:42 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > Sounds about right to me Peter. And I still shoot with my M8 (Don't have > a M9), and R8DMR, even though I have a Nikon D4 to play with. > > Cheers, > Gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Klein" <pklein at threshinc.com> > To: "lug" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:20:22 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica in the LUG > > Geoff: You're not alone. I am interested. I really am. But: > > 1. The M (240) is not yet available. > 2. When it becomes available, it will only be available to the folks > that pre-ordered it. > 3. Then it will become unavailable again. > 4. The usual Web sites will publish glowing articles an how bleeping > incredible the camera is and how no serious photographer could possibly > live without it. > 5. The other usual Web sites will publish snarky articles about how the > camera takes OK pictures, but nothing you couldn't do with a much more > versatile midrange C or N, about how it's neck jewelry for the "1%," and > about how they're not sure how Leica can still exist, even though it does. > 6. Someone on the Internet will find something seriously wrong with it. > 7. There will be several weeks/months of debate on whether the above > complainer used proper methodology, whether it's really a problem, and > whether Leica will survive the outrage. > 8. Leica will fix whatever problem was found. > 9. The camera will become available again. > 10. Something Later and Newer will capture the attention of the > photographic hive mind. > > It's somewhere between Steps 8 and 10 that I will consider whether the > new M might improve my photography sufficiently that it would be worth > selling a bunch of stuff and depleting my retirement savings to buy it. > If it would, I may bite. If not, I might upgrade to an M9 that a new M > purchaser is unloading. Meanwhile, I'm reading everything I can about > the new M. I'm hoping the new sensor puts it in the same high ISO > ballpark as the better DSLRs and the Fuji X-Pro 1. I'm optimistic that > it will still show the character of those incrediblishe lensen vee love > zo much (mit apologies to Jon Streeter :-) > > In the meantime, I continue to shoot with my M8 (remember them?). And > also with an un-Leica with very modern technology (Oly OM-D E-M5) for > the things that a rangefinder and digital Leicas don't do as well. > Unfortunately, that includes ISOs of over 800. > > Knock wood, I can still focus an RF at one year shy of 60, and it's > still my preferred way of working. If I had money to burn, I would > already own an MM--I love B&W, and it does beautiful high ISO. And if > hard times hit and I had to sell all my toys but a few, I'd keep my M6 > and a 50 Summicron, and shoot whatever fast B&W film was out there. > > So, can I stay? :-) > > --Peter > > Geoff Hopkinson wrote: >> Am I alone in being also interested in the forthcoming new Leica cameras >> here? Post activity sometimes seems to be anything but Leica >> My delete key is wearing out prematurely ;-) >> Paradigm shifts, Fujis, Sonys, DXO whatever,.... can't tell the >> difference.....a new crop of why product X or S is better than the M9, >> three years after the M9 actually came out and it is discontinued now >> anyway. >> The M typ 240 will be a huge evolution. Mine's on order. I guess we have >> no S system owners at all? but that new model is also evolving a great >> deal. >> At least the Monochrom is of interest and that one really is a "paradigm >> shift" >> Jeesh! >> >> Cheers, >> Geoff >> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information