Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:38:11 -0800

A friend of mine told me in the '70s that art directors didn't take 
photographers seriously unless they were shooting with Nikons, Hasselblads, 
and a few other well-known brands.  I never worked with an art director, so 
I took his word for it.  

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Greg Rubenstein" <gcr910 at gmail.com>
To: "lug at leica-users.org" <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] Subject: Re:  Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
Date: Wed, Nov 28, 2012 5:28 am


Simple explanation for all this tech and test stuff: use the right tool for 
what you're trying to accomplish regardless of brand. You know what works 
for you -- and your clients, who hire vision and results, not brands and 
data sheets.

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Subject: Re: Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)