Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:31:16 -0800
References: <BE0EE73A-8358-4257-84B5-FC4CFEA8D820@yahoo.com.sg> <CAH1UNJ10_=Z+cptrKwn84sgxXLDyL2FG73=GVBB569pBaSYJCw@mail.gmail.com> <991A1949-9723-4A51-AA2C-82B7512298A5@frozenlight.eu> <CAFfkXxvztWQCdMtDzd0T2fVo0LnQpayTPLEkWoX15tAAnNnzaw@mail.gmail.com> <E4B2D0F9-F2B0-4D57-BFF7-970DCAD042E5@frozenlight.eu>
I thought most Belgian beers were served in less than 20 ounce glasses....
Is that a problem?
Hic!
Frank Filippone
Red735i at verizon.net
strange things about the bar: they served the magnificent beers in regular
UK pint glasses
In reply to:
Message from davidhhching1 at yahoo.com.sg (David Ching) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)