Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]David, I have also zeroed in on the same two systems... Cheers Jayanand On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:33 AM, David Ching <davidhhching1 at yahoo.com.sg>wrote: > The DXO lab rates the sensor of the X100 higher than the M9. While many > will claim that it's the user experience that counts, in terms of value for > money, one cannot dispute that given that the Fuij comes with a lens too at > a price less than a used 50mm Summicron pre-ASPH, the Fuji wins hands down. > > And why should a full sensor like the RX1 be any better than a smaller > sensor, example the X100 if the final outcome of the shots are great? Maybe > the DOF may be a factor.. > Again the user factor differs between these two cameras. > > Personally I have used all 3 makes. As usual each has its merits and > idiosyncrasies. Enjoy them for what they are. > > However should I have to make a call, I'd use my Fuji X Pro 1 with the > superb 35mm for the "rangefinder" experience and my Nikon D800E for faster > action and professional work. > > Best wishes from the East, > > David Ching > > H.P. Tel. no.: +84 904684321 (Vietnam) > : +65 92321098 (Singapore) > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >