Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:59:42 +0000
References: <C8A0548CCDB94E0CB18B3C616AB2644D@Equibox> <CCDAE751.26CAD%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
DXO labs have some parts which do not suit CCD (M9 and medium format), low 
light/high ASA I think.

John
 
-----Original Message-----

The dxo lab also said a Nikon D800 makes for better results than medium 
format digtial. I'd just have to see that to believe and and am not 
believing it. Are top pros really going to not go medium format now because 
of that camera. I'm thinking it wont influence many away from shooting 
medium format digital where it had been used before for 90 percent of the 
stuff.

I've head a medium format digital Epson mat prints in my hand at Photokina a 
large print and it was exactly better than anything I'd seen full frame as a 
medium format film out put is over 35mm output.
More so even.

Mark William Rabiner
In reply to: Message from jon.streeter at cox.net (Jon Streeter) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Fuji X 100 versus Leica M9)