Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be the best enlarging lens on earth?
From: jon.streeter at cox.net (jon.streeter)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 08:40:47 -0800

I wore a 3M 9913 filter mask in the darkroom because the chemicals gave me 
headaches.  The mask was part of my darkroom kit.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone

----- Reply message -----
From: "Richard Man" <richard at richardmanphoto.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Subject: [Leica] So, wouldn't a 50mm Summicron LTM or 35mm f2 ASPH LTM be 
the best enlarging lens on earth?
Date: Sun, Nov 25, 2012 2:49 am


I bought an APO-Rodenstock ~3 years ago for about $175 or may be even under
$100, I think.

One of these days, I would do digital negatives again. Unlike others, I do
not mind the chemical much.


On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com> 
wrote:

> > But now an exquisite German or top Nikkor enlarging lens can be traded
> for a
> > pair of old shoes.
>
> Try finding an Apo-El-Nikkor or Zeiss Orthoplanar for less than $3K . . .
>
> The very best stuff is rare, and has increased, rather than lost
> value.  The more common good to excellent stuff has devalued
> enormously.
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information