Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have been using 4.2 for many months now. Very stable and miles better than LR3, if LR4 is the one that has the new "2012 Process" (it's been a while, I forgot :-) ) I'm sure my catalog was at least 80,000 when I did the conversion. You will get to keep the old ones too... On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>wrote: > This prompts me to ask the general question whether LR 4 is now > sufficiently stable--I recall some people had various issues in the > beginning, so I am still on LR 3. But now enough time has passed for any > kinks to have been ironed out, if we are already on version 4.3. I am > particularly risk averse wrt. catalog conversion, as mine has more than > 30000 pictures now. > > Another question is whether the improvements in LR 4 over 3 are > significant enough to make the upgrade worthwhile for someone like me who > takes a rather minimalist approach to post-processing. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Op Ma, 19 november, 2012 08:57, schreef Frank Filippone: > > I have a lot of images already put into a book. However, I wish to > change > > the format of the book from Standard to Large ( not quite the right > > names.) > > > > > > > > Will this do something to my pages if the same page template does not > > exist > > in both? > > > > > > > > Frank Filippone > > > > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > > -- > Nathan Wajsman > photo at frozenlight.eu > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>