Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/11/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]We all have our own experience, of course. What I'm talking about is my own, no one else's. It is possible that this applies only to me. Here's what I'm talking about: the capability of the machine to do the work and allow me to just compose and shoot in those instances where any kind of adjustment -- focusing a lens, setting an aperture, or setting a shutter speed, not to mention taking a light reading or balancing red triangles -- would mean missing a shot. The whammoflexes allow one to wheel about, this way and that, shooting into the dark, then into the light, then framing a brightly lit subject in a field of darkness, zooming in and out to compose to one's tastes. The machinery does the grunt work, and I do the thinking, and, when I want to shoot manually, of course, the DSLRs cooperate magnificently. Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Henning Wulff" <henningw at archiphoto.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Subject: [Leica] Marty, shutter lag in digital M Date: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 10:21 am On 2012-11-06, at 2:46 AM, jon.streeter wrote: > However, for other situations, > so-called street photography or candid weddings for example, in which > changing light and situations require refocusing and changing camera > settings, my Canon 20D and 5D have been very close to the answer to my > dreams. Having had and used both the 5D and 20D, I find this strange as the responsiveness of the M8 and 9 have certainly been better than that of the Canons. Henning Wulff henningw at archiphoto.com _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information