Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Though not a lot of people are going to be trading in their M9's for an M-E. As its for people who cant afford an M9. And if you already owned and M9 that kind of indicates that you can afford one. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:36:10 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Raw MM Files > > > On Oct 31, 2012, at 5:56 AM, Richard Man wrote: > >> Well yes of course, but I'm not sure the tradeoff between an ME for $5400 >> with color options vs. an MM for $8000 with better tonality is the right >> tradeoff. >> >> If they are both priced at $5000, then I'd jump for the MM too (if I have >> the budget) >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:22 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> >> wrote: >> >>> For me it is the tonality, never got the same from an M9 conversion. I am >>> more than happy with my MM compared to the 3200dpi Hasselblad scans >>> (FP4+) >>> I made earlier this year.... > > So very personal > on almost every single level of evaluation > (from economic to the tonal) > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information