Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Last 617 Test Shots
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 11:41:17 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-G6zTx3MZMiQT4+d07Pv+1hnWUhgM45P-kUJQ=xvH4Pog@mail.gmail.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E99C8B6E61@WHIZZMAIL02.whizz.org> <06ff01cdaec6$30f8ecf0$92eac6d0$@verizon.net>
 
It must be fate. I actually looked at photo.net earlier that day, but
somehow clicked the wrong view (sort by closing times) so it was looking at
the postings from a month ago....


On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
verizon.net>wrote:

> Yes, but not the reference..... Frank found him a cheap 300 Nikkor M.
>
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
>
>
> Cool, so as Frank asked, what went wrong in the original tests?
>
> john
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Last 617 Test Shots)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Last 617 Test Shots)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Last 617 Test Shots)