Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/10/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Have you been eating too many bagels with a smear? The Newspapers out there use Nikons or Canons because they do not need more resolution or quality or whatever you call it that comes out of an Iphone. In fact, I predict the IPhone will become the de facto standard backup camera for all Newspaper guys.....maybe even the #1 camera..... PJ's can't afford any Leica lenses, if they could afford the $7K for the body. Street shooters are, in general, amateurs... they can afford whatever they want.... but how many will want a non-AF camera? The ISO standard on the MM or new M is still dismal by Nikon standards... If you shoot in dim light, go get a Nikon. Zoom? What Zoom? Putting a 4 pound lens in front of the M is a disaster waiting to happen... and we still do not know it works... or is useable if it does work... You want an Digi-SLR, go buy one. Nikon and Canon are good names. Good glass too. Leitax makes the lens mount conversions if you have R glass waiting for a Digi-Body.... Be happy that Leica has produced a new M ... even if they forgot how to count beyond 9. But let's not get crazy.... As I have said in the past... made for Doctors, Lawyers, and Indian Chiefs..... In modern language.... Oligarchs, Monopolists, and those that live in Russia or China.... Or, IOW, Amateurs..... well healed amateurs. It's the glass that will break your wallet, not the body..... Leica is holding its own... and wants to achieve a 1% ( or was it 2%?) market share (as the number of cameras decreases by the inverse cube law) within some number of short years.. (3? 5?)... But a major player.... Stop eating the bagels... Frank Filippone Red735i at verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark Rabiner Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 8:22 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] D800E pixel-peepers Because of the Leica M and Monochrom cameras. Both will be sought after by top reportage people, street shooters. All kinds of shooters really. The M9 was not so much in the limelight because it was not so much in the low light. Full frame alone was not enough to make the difference. People want Jam on their bagels. They most certainly wanted to do what could be done with a DSLR. Now they can. Even zoom. We'll see a huge difference public relations wise with stories about top jobs being shot with the new Leica M's. Night jobs, low light jobs. Traditional standard Leica M jobs. The Leica glass which has come out in the past decade will be allowed to shine like never before. As well as the Leica glass from pervious decades. My Leica glass is mainly from the turn of the millennium. The Late 90's. Early 2000's. The 21 and 24 Elmarit ASPH 's and the 35mm Summicron ASPH. A Noctilux and a 135 f3.4 Telyt M APO. And two 90's an Elmarit from the previous vintage made with NASA money and the ASPH APO Summicron. When I got a new M its going to be quite a thing getting much of this glass to work with it I guess. No clue how much I'll have to budget for that. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:26:05 +0000 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] D800E pixel-peepers > > So why do you think that 2013 will be the year of Leica's resurgence? > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > Yes I would love a direct comparison of a D600 with modern nikon 50mm > being put to shame by Leica's latest. The fact is Canons and Nikons > are producing gorgeous images every day by the top people out there as > we speak. I'd think for 5 times the money a Leica could edge it out a > bit. But its not going to be a big deal. Nobodies going to be > shedding a tear they are forced to use the Canons and Nikons. Canon > Nikon results are exquisite. Leica is proably a bit more that that. > > Mark William Rabiner > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information