Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I did some showing the top of the arch, but prefer this one. The visual tension of the broken arch emphasizes the incompleteness of the building's life. It was abandoned because t was rendered obsolete by changes in the way schools were operated, not because there is anything wrong with the building, which still appears to be structurally sound. -- Chris Crawford Fine Art Photography Fort Wayne, Indiana 260-437-8990 http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com My portfolio http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com My latest work! http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798 Become a fan on Facebook On 9/21/12 12:00 PM, "tedgrant at shaw.ca" <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: >Chris Crawford OFFERED: >Subject: [Leica] Jefferson Township #4 Schoolhouse > > >> http://chriscrawfordphoto.com/chris-details.php?prodId=1515&category=4 >> >> Another from the archives. I'm busy scanning hundreds of rolls of film >> that >> piled up when I was in grad school (I shot tons of film, but didn't have >> time to scan and edit it!).<<<<<<<< > >Hi Chris, >Just out of curiosity may I ask? When you cropped this image, why would >or >did you crop off halfway though the "curve of bricks forming the door >way?" > >Surely the extension slightly higher would've formed the perfect curve >and >enhanced the composition. > >Just wondering as that was my first reaction as the image opened on >screen... "Now why woud he crop the top like that and spoil the >composition?" I asked myself. > >So over to you me old son. Thank you. > >cheers, >Dr. ted > > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information