Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Isn't 120 TS similar to 90mm on the 35mm? I thought the most useful TS are on the short end (for architecture)? On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>wrote: > No 'new' lenses, just some announcements on formerly announced lenses, and > a rebadged Schneider TS. > > The S upgrade seems to be mainly upgraded processing power. > > Henning > > > On 2012-09-17, at 7:51 PM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote: > > > Yes on the new S, but they are not giving many details, as to what is > changed. A couple of new lenses though which is good news. > > > > Cheers, > > Gene > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> > > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 8:17:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > > Subject: Re: [Leica] So, did the price of DMR's just plummet? If so, I > might be tempted to buy another one. > > > > Locally at least some dealers have been instructed to buy used R lenses > > again for the last few weeks. I think you missed the boat on cheap R > lenses > > some time back anyway (with the Canon option) > > Probably you wouldn't buy one just to use a couple of short R lenses, > > Vick??? > > But what about those folks with a cupboard full of the magnificent long > > APO Summicron Rs etc?' > > My initial impression is that M shooters with a lot of M lenses and still > > some of the top line R ones might find this attractive? I bet that Leica > > sells all of the M's they can make but only a handful of the R stuff for > > them though. > > Starting from scratch it wouldn't make sense to buy into this system. The > > full frame Nikons (or Canon I guess?) with dedicated AF lenses make more > > sense for most folks... but then Leica enthusiasts aren't most folks ;-) > > Interesting that all but one R lens owner I know so far is not overly > > impressed. > > > > Back in 2009 when I was in Germany, Stefan Daniel said there would be no > > R10 or conventional dSLR from them but there would be a means to use R > > lenses, Still true. > > > > Anyone else notice the new S as well???? > > > > Cheers, > > Geoff > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > > > > > > On 18 September 2012 10:34, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: > > > >> So, did the price of DMR's just plummet? If so, I might be tempted to > buy > >> another one. > >> > >> And, the price of R lenses that overlap the M range, did they just > plummet > >> too? > >> > >> ergo, why would you want the 80/1.4 when the 75/1.4 can now be focused > >> accurately with Live View, and compensated for any focus shift? > >> > >> ....idle thoughts when I should be doing homework.... > >> > >> Vick > >> > >> ______________________________**_________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug< > http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for more information > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > Henning Wulff > henningw at archiphoto.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>