Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/09/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RNC and DNC
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:49:19 -0700
References: <mailman.677.1347357756.1186.lug@leica-users.org> <C30BDD2D-8009-4D8C-B84B-2CA3C52F623A@gmail.com> <002101cd90f9$0ddd8450$29988cf0$@cox.net>

On Sep 12, 2012, at 8:12 AM, "Ken Carney" <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote:

> I was hoping the difference was that the RNC delegates were working instead
> of partying, but of course I know better.  Also I forgot to mention,
> excellent photos.


both parties of course were working, one to accomplish something, the other 
to do the opposite,



Steve


> 
> Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Craig
> Semetko
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 9:56 PM
> To: lug at leica-users.org
> Subject: [Leica] RNC and DNC
> 
> Hey Ken,
> 
> I'm pretty sure both parties were well funded--the RNC folks were spending
> their free time at private parties outside the downtown area. I know that
> they had a fence built around a public park and held private parties there.
> And I was not allowed in at least two big private parties in Ybor City. I
> think the key difference was the RNC bused the delegates in and out of the
> downtown area, and the DNC people stayed in the downtown area. So there 
> were
> just more people around the respective arenas.
> 
> And yes, I did photograph RNC at least one delegate without a snarl:), but
> editorial decisions have to be made (I doubt you'd like to have seen all 
> the
> hundreds of shots I took) and the semi-snarl guy was indicative of the
> general lack of enthusiasm at the RNC, and plus, that shot was better
> composed than others that might have included a smile. 
> 
> Thanks for your comments,
> 
> craig
> 
> 
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:02 AM, lug-request at leica-users.org wrote:
> 
>> From: "Ken Carney" <kcarney1 at cox.net>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] RNC and DNC
>> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Message-ID: <001801cd8faf$569ef840$03dce8c0$@cox.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> Well, it definitely looks like the DNC delegates had more time on 
>> their hands, not to mention party money.  I wonder if any of the RNC 
>> delegates were photographed without a semi-snarl on their face
> (semetko-dem-3)?
>> 
>> Ken
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+kcarney1=cox.net at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
>> Craig Semetko
>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 6:13 PM
>> To: lug at leica-users.org
>> Subject: [Leica] RNC and DNC
>> 
>> Hey All,
>> 
>> I put a new post on my blog today giving my impressions of the RNC 
>> convention in Tampa, FL and the DNC in Charlotte, NC. They were very 
>> different experiences, and with the exception of one photo, all were 
>> taken with an M9 and 35 or 50 summilux. Enjoy!
>> 
>> http://semetko.com/2012/09/democratic-national-convention-charlotte-nc
>> /
>> 
>> cheers,
>> 
>> craig
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] RNC and DNC)
In reply to: Message from csemetko at gmail.com (Craig Semetko) ([Leica] RNC and DNC)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] RNC and DNC)