Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I wouldn't mind seeing either larger thumbs or a smaller set. I like looking at them big, but I guess Firefox can't scale the shots to fit the screen, so I can look at the whole shot. Am I being clear? In the LUG gallery you see a shot smaller, then click to get big. My wordpress gallery can size as large as your screen allows, if I set the pix that way. At work it is no problem, but in the mornings, I am often looking on my little ultrabook. On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:20 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote: > So would people rather I do a set at 1200 - my usual larger size? I do not > think you see much at 1200 but I run high res monitors ;-) > > john > > -----Original Message----- > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:00 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> > wrote: > > > > > > > http://johnmcmaster.com/Monochrom/Day_1/ - big images are 1800 pixels > > on long side > > > Looks like they all played big. Kinda hard to look at. > > -- > Regards, > > Sonny > http://sonc.com/look/ > Natchitoches, Louisiana > > USA > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Regards, Sonny http://sonc.com/look/ Natchitoches, Louisiana USA