Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] TRI-X: RIP
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:39:37 -0500 (CDT)
References: <5038f4c0.53a13a0a.23a7.06bd@mx.google.com> <CAFuU78ecxPd=mFSe0Edv+=tcoqpcQHdY6VtPPZCkjZBnqbor-Q@mail.gmail.com> <41451EB9FB474C22AAA0AD3A5125E99C@billHP>

I want High Speed Infrared!


On Aug 25, 2012, at 11:58 AM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> Screw Tri-X I want, no I need 120 Plus-X! And to be precise, I want 160NC, 
> too.
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Lew Schwartz
> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 11:14 AM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] TRI-X: RIP
> 
> It is premature, but I think the main concern for most photographers,
> realistic or not, is going to be their umbilical, mythological connection
> with bw history. Once they sell the brand and the technology, everyone will
> start wondering if the producers will trouble to duplicate the Kodak
> process especially since the new owners will likely be ones with their own
> production facilities already in place.
> 
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:52 AM, jshulman at judgecrater.com <
> jshulman at judgecrater.com> wrote:
> 
>> Isn't this death notice a bit premature? From what I've read, Kodak has
>> only announced its intention to sell their film division. They also said
>> that film production will continue with the current product line.  The
>> intellectual property for the sale, the formulary, product names, logos,
>> are an intrinsic part of any sale.
>> 
>> Of course, eventually there will likely not be enough demand for the
>> product, as we go further and further away from.the analog camera era. But
>> then, eventually well be gone, too (g).
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Reply message -----
>> From: "Lew Schwartz" <lew1716 at gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, Aug 25, 2012 11:28 am
>> Subject: [Leica] TRI-X: RIP
>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>> 
>> I can't get too upset about it. The recent tri-x, with all it's
>> 'improvements' wasn't the tri-x everyone is beating their chests about
>> anyway. I know many have very loyal, nostalgic feelings about this and an
>> imagined connection to past great photographers, but they missed the bus
>> some time ago, imo. My main iso 400 film has been HP5+ for years and the
>> Freestyle emulsions (whoever makes them) aren't bad either.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Lew Schwartz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (jshulman@judgecrater.com) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] TRI-X: RIP)