Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/08/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree and am convinced that the world will with me as I already see it happening that pigment, preferably carbon on 100% rag matt paper is the way to go archivally but also coincidently aesthetically on printing today. But the day you make your print with this burgeoning brand new technology it starts to fade every single day it exits on the planet . A digital file will not fade. I can see someone who hates all forms of digital you name it liking it for one reason only. It's stay the same ness. Its yes and no and nothing in between ness. Its digital ness. Every roll you shoot and process is on the planet for only so many days before it fades to a point where it is worthless. Even more so for any print you make. Back up your files on more than one hard disk. Print it in the year 2525 using holograms with rare earth minerals from the next galaxy. It will be just as viable as it is today. Archival-ness is the advantage of digital. Not it's disadvantage. And a film negative or digital file on a disk is an original file. Any print you make form it next year you'd do it better. A print is a performance from an original file; a score. Its not a final result. That's been a basic fact of photography since day one and applies much more so now by a mile. Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Paul Roark <roark.paul at gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:21:42 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Amazon's long-term storage > > Spencer Cheng <spencer at aotera.org> wrote: > ... >> According to the National Archive in Canada, the only archival medium >> suitable for 100 years is acid-free paper or microfiche. > > > Is there any good science on the longevity of inkjet paper? > > Current testing seems to hold the temperature and humidity constant. > On the other hand, coated and laminated substrates like our popular > inkjet papers are probably most affected by the cycling of these > variables and the stresses they cause in the substrate. > > I personally think a non-coated paper like Arches Hot Press watercolor > paper is the most likely to still be in good shape hundreds of years > from now. Frankly, the Arches prints on my wall are my favorite > B&W's, and that paper is cheaper than inkjet paper. > > (And in another thread we may be seeing an unexpected edge yellowing > in a "high end" glossy "baryta" type paper after only 6 years of > storage.) > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information