Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2012/08/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 17:25:02 -0700
References: <CE1DF323-7159-4905-A41D-E143289C6367@gmail.com> <CC4D8590.223A6%mark@rabinergroup.com> <002a01cd78df$d37b3680$7a71a380$@cox.net> <CABmfTOWEuwjdFJ7o_cPcaeC2FhZ9SWWeZCbMepie+qZtiUxAsA@mail.gmail.com> <002c01cd78e7$25ab3c50$7101b4f0$@cox.net> <CABmfTOUuEqunHULSyox3MO4cvkEMCEBFrCn9h3Z=+YBUuFfLTQ@mail.gmail.com>
The trick I learned is to add Selenium to the Hypo Clearing agent, two
steps in one...
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
wrote:
> > ....I wonder
> > what a 16x20 pt/pd print would cost these days? It was not exactly cheap
> > when I was making 8x10 contact prints.
>
> Here in Australia, about $45, not counting time/labour, and depending
> on the paper stock. I costed it for someone the other day.
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
--
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
In reply to:
Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] New on my Blog: Paris 1990 new pics)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] Toning vs. paper and print color.)