Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:17:59 -0400

How about gyro's?

Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Piers Hemy <piers.hemy at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:22:21 +0100
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
> 
> They are both banned too!
> 
> Piers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com at leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+piers.hemy=gmail.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Mark
> Rabiner
> Sent: 29 July 2012 20:58
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
> 
> I thought a pro was defined by if they used a tripod or not. A monopod 
> even.
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> 
> 
>> From: Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:24:26 +0100
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos
>> 
>> Lew
>> 
>> You are correct, despite the sponsorship by Panasonic.
>> 
>> Gerry
>> 
>> Gerry Walden
>> +44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
>> +44 (0)797 287 7932
>> www.gwpics.com
>> 
>> On 29 Jul 2012, at 14:54, Lew Schwartz wrote:
>> 
>>> ... and I believe that I've read that they have taken the position
>>> that all interchangeable lens cameras are, by their definitions,
>>> commercial and evidence of commercial use.
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've heard several examples like that.  It looks like they would be
>>>> happy to have other people advertise for them!  Makes no sense to me!
>>>> 
>>>> Tina
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Gerry Walden <gerry.walden at me.com>
> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Piers
>>>>> 
>>>>> My only comment would be that a school on the Isle of Wight was
>>>>> made to remove rings of flowers made by children, and a florist in
>>>>> a small town
>>>> in
>>>>> Dorset was made to remove similar rings in the shop window put
>>>>> there on
>>>> the
>>>>> day the torch came through. Of very dubious, if any, commercial
>>>>> benefit
>>>> and
>>>>> both over the top reactions in my opinion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gerry
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gerry Walden
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Tina Manley, ASMP
>>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -Lew Schwartz
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos)
In reply to: Message from piers.hemy at gmail.com (Piers Hemy) ([Leica] Rights to Olympic Photos)