Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M Monochrom? That's so August 2012
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:50:04 -0400
 
Well I don't think Leica is stupid. I think it will probably be lower rez.
Though rez wise its s tad on the low side anyway.

- - from my iRabs.
Mark Rabiner
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/


> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:30:19 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M Monochrom? That's so August 2012
> 
> 
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> Does it say some where the differences between the 10 and 23k versions?
> 
> the only difference I've heard rumored so far = $13K
> and the month or year you happen to take out your check book
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] M Monochrom? That's so August 2012)
 In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M Monochrom? That's so August 2012)