Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2012/07/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Olympic Photos (Ric Carter)
From: rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee)
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 10:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
References: <1341161708.71247.YahooMailNeo@web160903.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

Don't think money was actually spent, and that may be the problem.? These 
are from a Media Day; I don't think they're "official" photographs from the 
USOC.

Another "OMG CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS!?!?!?!?!" facebook hyperdrive moment.

?
R. Clayton McKee
PhotoJournalist
from somewhere just south of somewhere else...


>________________________________
> From: Rod Smith <bigdlakeside at yahoo.com>
>To: "lug at leica-users.org" <lug at leica-users.org> 
>Sent: Sunday, July 1, 2012 11:55 AM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Olympic Photos (Ric Carter)
> 
>I cannot find anything redeeming about the photos as presented.
>Well, maybe some have ok exposure, were in focus and have decent color. 
>Thanks maybe to automated equipment.
>The list of faults could go on and on.
>These look worse than amateurish, they are just plain bad.
>With as much money being spent on the Olympics, this is one area where 
>money was poorly spent.
>Rod Smith
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>


In reply to: Message from bigdlakeside at yahoo.com (Rod Smith) ([Leica] Olympic Photos (Ric Carter))